excerpt from the introduction of “The Love That Does Justice: Spiritual Activism in Dialogue With Social Science,” edited By Michael A. Edwards & Stephen G
We belong to the Peace and Justice Studies Association (PJSA) and glean many, many brilliant ideas from their mailing list. This long passage was passed onto us by one of their members, which explains EXACTLY what we are engaged in Compassion:
“Doing unto others” require[s] the irreplaceable face-to-face interpersonal works of love, but it also requires the courage to confront larger, systemic unfairness. However much “random acts of kindness” can inspire, however much compassionate actions are trumpeted as “a thousand points of light,” these invaluable works of love must not deflect attention away from the underlying problematic of injustice—the entrenched group selfishness that is blind to the common good. Love that does not “descend” into the struggle for justice is incomplete, if not irrelevant.
Engaged spirituality, therefore, explicitly confronts social, political, and economic structures that are deemed unjust and contributory to the suffering of some needful group. Mahatma Gandhi, Martin Luther King, Abraham Heschel, and Bishop Desmond Tutu are obvious examples. Their moral appeal is to human dignity and human rights, and their endeavor is to effect structural change. The psychological dynamic involved in these efforts requires the persistent confrontation of entrenched powers that are recalcitrant to change.
In this sense, love is radical equality consciousness, a force that breaks down all distance and hierarchy.
This is a love that respects the necessary self-empowerment of others, eschewing paternalism and romanticism for relationships of truth and authenticity, even when they move through phases of conflict and disagreement, as all do. This is a love that encourages us to live up to our social obligations as well our individual moral values, connect our interior life worlds to public spaces, encourage collective judgments, and create open networks of self-reflective and critical communication.
This love is active, not passive, explicitly considering the effects of oppressive and exploitative systems and structures on the welfare of others; it is not just focused on the immediate circle of family and friends, but rather on a deep and abiding commitment to the liberation of all. This is a love that seeks not to accumulate power, even in the face of oppression, but to transform it so that “victory” means more than a game of revolving chairs among narrow political interests.
This love forms an essential counterbalance to an excess of reason, adding in the discrimination, humility, intuition, ethical commitments, and emotional intelligence that are essential ingredients of wisdom. This love helps us to understand when and how to uphold and apply rationality, even in the toughest of circumstances, by increasing self-awareness of our biases, prejudices, and blind spots, and sustaining our objectivity about our own strengths and shortcomings. Love releases us from fear and insecurity, and our diminished sense of self. Love gives us optimism and hope, an expansion rather than contraction of our critical faculties, openness instead of closure.
Love does not generate ready-made answers to deep rooted and intractable problems of economic and social life, codified according to the conventional logics of Left or Right, Jewish, Muslim, or Christian. Instead, it provides a different set of motivations from which alternatives can grow, eventually producing a “social science of love” that can demonstrate how politics, economics, organizational development, social and international relations can be transformed through this radically-different form of rationality.
The key to social transformation can be found in marrying a rich inner life dedicated to the cultivation of loving kindness and compassion with the practice of new forms of politics, economics, and public policy.”